Color Blindness Simulator

See any image the way people with protanopia, deuteranopia, tritanopia or achromatopsia see it — side by side with the original, at adjustable severity.

The Color Blindness Simulator runs entirely in your browser using the canvas. Your images are processed on your device and never uploaded.

Open the Contrast Checker

About Color Blindness Simulator

Color Blindness Simulator shows your chart, interface or photo through the eyes of the roughly 8% of men and 0.5% of women with a colour-vision deficiency. Drop an image, pick a vision type — deuteranopia and protanopia (the common red-green forms), tritanopia (rare blue-yellow) or achromatopsia (no colour at all) — and compare the result against the original side by side. The simulation uses the physiologically based Machado transformation matrices, applied in linear light with proper gamma handling, so the result is a research-grade preview rather than a grey-tinted guess. A severity slider covers the far more common partial deficiencies, where colour discrimination is reduced but not absent. If your error and success states differ only by red versus green, thirty seconds here will show you exactly what a colour-blind user cannot see.

Features

How to use the Color Blindness Simulator

  1. Drop in a screenshot, chart or design
  2. Pick the vision type to simulate
  3. Adjust severity for partial deficiencies
  4. Compare the panels and download the result if needed

Example

Input

Dashboard with red error and green success badges

Output

Under deuteranopia both badges render as the same murky ochre

The classic red-green failure — invisible until you look through the right eyes.

Common errors & troubleshooting

Frequently asked questions

What do the different types of color blindness mean?
Protanopia is missing red cones, deuteranopia missing green cones — both collapse reds and greens together and affect about 1% of men each, with milder anomalous forms far more common. Tritanopia affects blue-yellow and is rare; achromatopsia removes colour entirely.
How common is color blindness?
Roughly 8% of men and 0.5% of women have some red-green deficiency — about one in twelve male users of anything you build. Complete colour absence is far rarer, around 0.003%.
How accurate is this simulation?
It uses the Machado, Oliveira and Fernandes matrices from vision research, applied in linear RGB with proper gamma conversion — the standard approach for dichromacy preview. Individual perception varies, but the confusions it reveals are the real ones.
How do I make my design work for color-blind users?
Never let colour be the only signal: pair it with icons, labels or patterns. Keep text contrast at 4.5:1 or better, and prefer blue-orange palettes over red-green for charts. WCAG 1.4.1 codifies exactly this.
Which vision type should I test first?
Deuteranopia — it is the most common significant deficiency and representative of red-green confusion generally. If your design reads correctly under deuteranopia and in greyscale, you have covered the overwhelming majority of cases.

Related tools

All ArrayKit tools